![]() ![]() Overall 61% reported at least one data loss in the past year, 51% in organisations with more than 3,000 employees and 68% in organisations with 1,000-3,000 employees. According to research firm Quocirca, data loss through printing is prevalent, even among organisations that operate a managed print service. Hackers can intercept data while it’s being transmitted to the printer. No matter how much we try to keep the devices secure, there are various ways via which a printer can get hacked. They have evolved from being mere printing and photocopying machines into smart workplace assistants, installed directly into company networks, and carrying considerable amount of confidential data in their print jobs. Printers continue to be one of the most essential devices in any office-small, medium or large. For those in IT, it’s critical to the security of an organisation’s network to make sure that security infractions can’t happen through network connected MFPs or at the devices themselves. And for many organisations, these security breaches can end with costly fines and litigation, to the tune of hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. It can lead to harmful disclosure, stolen or compromised intellectual property and trade secrets. A breach in the security of an organisation’s printers can result in unauthorised use of sensitive or proprietary information. However, what’s really interesting is that majority of the organisations tend to overlook upgrade or check printers in the process. An organisation takes many a step to make sure that their information stays safe from leaks or thefts, be it via new or upgraded IT frameworks, security protocols, et al. Being connected comes with its own set of pros and cons the biggest one being risks to information security. Virtually every business, and every person in it, is connected to the internet. … Any information that is let loose on the Internet can never be retrieved, and any breach or misuse of this data could harm prospects for life, by impairing his ability to be admitted to college or get a good job.In the 21st century, the network is the backbone of all business activities. Karen Sprowal, one of the plaintiffs in the New York case, said in a statement: “Ever since I’ve heard about InBloom Inc. In New York, a law suit has been launched to prevent the New York State Education Department from partnering with the service. But after parents became concerned by plans to compile students’ information into one huge database for school-related businesses, InBloom has been dropped by numerous states. According to Education Week, InBloom began promisingly, with million-dollar grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In November, the Chicago school system, the nation’s third largest, rejected the controversial student data management nonprofit, InBloom, deciding instead to build its own platform. The report comes amid a parent-led backlash against the use of third-party vendors for storing student information. “We’ve seen an increase in student information collection and dissemination, but a decrease in privacy protection,” she said. ![]() Barnes added that Fordham’s findings confirmed what EPIC has been hearing from parents and students-they feel like they’re losing control. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |